📖
✓ Editorially reviewed by Derek Giordano, Founder & Editor · BA Business Marketing

Reading Level Calculator

Check the grade level and readability of your writing

Updated October 2026

🧮
700+ calculators, no signup required
Finance · Health · Math · Science · Business
nnng.com
Flesch-Kincaid grade = 0.39 × words per sentence + 11.8 × syllables per word − 15.59; Reading Ease = 206.835 − 1.015 × words per sentence − 84.6 × syllables per word. The sample paragraph in the calculator (70 words in 6 sentences) scores Grade 5.0 (Flesch-Kincaid), ease 80.2, which reads as easy, about 6th grade. Its Gunning Fog index is 6.4 and Coleman-Liau 6.9. Shorter sentences and shorter words lower every score.

The Formulas

ScoreFormulaReads as
Flesch Reading Ease206.835 − 1.015 × (words ÷ sentences) − 84.6 × (syllables ÷ words)0–100, higher is easier
Flesch-Kincaid Grade0.39 × (words ÷ sentences) + 11.8 × (syllables ÷ words) − 15.59U.S. school grade
Gunning Fog0.4 × (words per sentence + 100 × share of 3+ syllable words)Years of schooling
Coleman-Liau0.0588 × letters per 100 words − 0.296 × sentences per 100 words − 15.8U.S. school grade
Automated Readability Index4.71 × characters per word + 0.5 × words per sentence − 21.43U.S. school grade

Paste at least a few sentences; the results list each score, the Reading Ease band (90 and up very easy, 60 to 70 plain English, below 30 very difficult), an average of the four grade scores, and the word, sentence and syllable counts behind them.

Worked Example: the Sample Paragraph

The default text has 70 words in 6 sentences, 11.67 words per sentence, and 95 syllables by the calculator’s count, 1.357 per word. Flesch-Kincaid grade = 0.39 × 11.67 + 11.8 × 1.357 − 15.59 = 5.0. Reading Ease = 206.835 − 1.015 × 11.67 − 84.6 × 1.357 = 80.2, in the “easy” band. Three words have three or more syllables, so the Fog index is 0.4 × (11.67 + 100 × 3 ÷ 70) = 6.4.

How Sentence and Word Length Move the Grade

TextWords per sentenceSyllables per wordReading EaseFK gradeFog
Calculator sample (6 sentences)11.71.3680.25.06.4
Same words joined into 2 sentences with semicolons35.01.3656.514.115.7
Children’s text: “Sam has a red ball. He likes to throw it. The dog runs to get it. Then they play again.”5.01.05112.9-1.22.0
Academic sentence: “Statistical significance, conventionally determined through comparison of the calculated probability with a predetermined threshold, provides insufficient information regarding the practical importance of an observed difference.”25.02.64-41.925.332.4

Joining the sample into two sentences changes no words but adds 9.1 grade levels. The scales are not bounded: the children’s text scores above 100 for ease and below grade 0, and the academic sentence, one long sentence of long words, falls below zero for ease.

Where the Formulas Came From

Rudolf Flesch published the Reading Ease formula in 1948. J. Peter Kincaid and colleagues recalculated it as a grade level in February 1975 for the U.S. Navy, testing 531 enlisted personnel on technical training material; the same report also recalculated the ARI and Fog formulas, but this calculator uses the original ARI and Gunning Fog versions most tools report. Coleman and Liau designed their 1975 formula around letter counts so a machine could score text without counting syllables. Because the grade-level formulas were fit to adult readers, they are rough guides for school texts. A 2021 review of 2,585 patient education materials compared them with the American Medical Association’s recommended sixth-grade level and the National Institutes of Health’s eighth-grade level; only 2.1% and 8.2% met them.

Pitfalls: Syllable Counts, Lists and Short Samples

Expecting the same score as Word. Every tool counts syllables and sentence breaks its own way, so scores can differ by a grade or more on the same text. Compare drafts in one tool.

Pasting bullet lists or headings. Lines without end punctuation run together into one long “sentence” and inflate the grade. Add periods or score the prose separately.

Scoring a few lines. Two or three sentences give unstable results; a few paragraphs average out the odd long sentence.

Treating the score as quality. The formulas measure sentence and word length only. Short, choppy text can score well and still be confusing, and a technical term the reader needs may raise the grade for a good reason.

Abbreviations and numbers. “Dr.” or “3.5” followed by a space can be read as a sentence end, and numerals count as one-syllable words.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a good Flesch Reading Ease score?
60 to 70 is the plain-English band that most adults read easily; higher is easier.
What grade level should I write at?
For patient health materials, the AMA recommends about a sixth-grade level and the NIH about eighth grade; general web content often aims for a similar range, while technical audiences can handle more.
How is the Flesch-Kincaid grade level calculated?
0.39 × average words per sentence + 11.8 × average syllables per word − 15.59.
Why do different tools give different readability scores?
They count syllables, words and sentences differently; the formulas are the same, but the inputs vary.
Can a Flesch Reading Ease score be negative?
Yes. Very long sentences full of long words push it below zero; the 0 to 100 range is typical, not a limit.
What is the difference between Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid?
Reading Ease is a 0–100 score where higher is easier; Flesch-Kincaid converts the same two inputs into a U.S. grade level where lower is easier.
Do readability formulas measure clarity?
No. They measure sentence and word length only, not organization, accuracy or tone.

How to Use This Calculator

  1. Paste your text — a few paragraphs of prose give the steadiest scores.
  2. Check reading level — scores calculate from your text.
  3. Read the grade scores — Flesch-Kincaid, Fog, Coleman-Liau and ARI, plus Reading Ease.
  4. Revise and recheck — shorter sentences and words lower the grade.
📚 Sources & References
  1. [1] Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948;32(3):221-233. doi:10.1037/h0057532. PMID 18867058. doi.org
  2. [2] Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of new readability formulas for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report 8-75, February 1975 (DTIC ADA006655). apps.dtic.mil
  3. [3] Coleman M, Liau TL. A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. J Appl Psychol. 1975;60(2):283-284. doi:10.1037/h0076540. doi.org
  4. [4] Rooney MK et al. Readability of patient education materials from high-impact medical journals: a 20-year analysis. J Patient Exp. 2021;8. doi:10.1177/2374373521998847. PMID 34179407. doi.org
✅ Editorial Standards — Every calculator is built from peer-reviewed formulas and official data sources, editorially reviewed for accuracy, and updated regularly. Read our full methodology · About the author